Here, look:



-Carolina

Kalpesh: If you’re so married to the anthropic principle, why bother at all? Eva: No, 34 dimensio

oh. duh. right. in that case i see where you’re going. -Eva

I’m not married to it, I’m just trying things on for size. Anyway, I don’t see why we can’t just

Doesn’t this

Yi, re: your point about,      the slow motion approximation is still useful for setting the parameters.

I appreciate the sophistication of your refinements, but I don’t think that, for our purposes, the results are
effort. We’re dealing with orders of magnitude here. -Carolina

Here, look:



-Carolina

Kalpesh: If you’re so married to the anthropic principle, why bother at all? Eva: No, 34 dimensions. -Miguel

oh. duh. right. in that case i see where you’re going. -Eva

I’m not married to it, I’m just trying things on for size. Anyway, I don’t see why we can’t just use

Doesn’t this seem more practical? -Kalpesh

Yi, re: your point about,      the slow motion approximation is still useful for setting the parameters.

I appreciate the sophistication of your refinements, but I don’t think that, for our purposes, the results are worth the
effort. We’re dealing with orders of magnitude here. -Carolina