I’m starting to wonder if there is a workable solution. We may need to abandon this line of thou
This is not a fruitful inquiry at the present. -Yi

i’m going batshit crazy. there IS a workable solution, we’re just not

Can’t you just use an old computer that wa
the younger version of itself? -Wayne

go away, wayne. the adults are talking

Did anyone else read the paper fro
to the stress-energy tensor for asymmetric spin. -Car

yikes. Just trying to help. -Wayne

I am going to propose that we focus on the W
Consider: it is key to the existence of superluminal photons in the f

i read that piece. i just did NOT like their treatment of the dispersion relation. i thought it was sloppy and
error-prone. -Eva

That is a valid point. But broaden your thinking and consider the conceptual framework. -Carolina

I’m focused on preparing for Thursday’s test, but I’ll read the article this weekend, Carolina. Thanks for reminding
us of it. I respect Chiarello’s other work a whole lot

going back to epr...after all this shit settles down, someone remind me to
this’ll jog my memory:



Eva

I’m starting to wonder if there is a workable solution. We may need to abandon this line of thought for some time.
This is not a fruitful inquiry at the present. -Yi

i’m going batshit crazy. there IS a workable solution, we’re just not seeing it. -Eva

Can’t you just use an old computer that was around like 20 years ago and just, you know, send the message to
the younger version of itself? -Wayne

go away, wayne. the adults are talking. -Eva

Did anyone else read the paper from late last year by Chiarello et al? I posted a link. They proposed a bold change
to the stress-energy tensor for asymmetric spin. -Carolina

yikes. Just trying to help. -Wayne

I am going to propose that we focus on the Weyl curvature tensor instead, as it is the polarization dependent term.
Consider: it is key to the existence of superluminal photons in the first place. -Yi

i read that piece. i just did NOT like their treatment of the dispersion relation. i thought it was sloppy and
error-prone. -Eva

That is a valid point. But broaden your thinking and consider the conceptual framework. -Carolina

I’m focused on preparing for Thursday’s test, but I’ll read the article this weekend, Carolina. Thanks for reminding
us of it. I respect Chiarello’s other work a whole lot. -Kalpesh

going back to epr...after all this shit settles down, someone remind me to follow through with an idea i had. here,
this’ll jog my memory:



Eva